I've tried quite a few, but to my ears, even the best of them are often closer to special effects than to something I'd want to use on every track in every mix. Tape and tube emulations, mix bus compressors, non‑specific analogue warmth generators. All too often, such plug‑ins simply compromise rather than complement the good qualities of a digital mix, such as clarity, separation and accurate representation of transients. And on the sonic side of things, I've rarely been convinced by plug‑ins designed to reproduce the mysterious 'glue' that many people claim is missing from digital mixing environments. The precision of drawing in automation with the mouse wins every time over the limited amounts of real‑time control that you get from eight cheap faders and a few knobs. On the ergonomic front, for instance, I've never enjoyed using small assignable fader surfaces. The latter has been expanded here to show the grouping controls.Īs a home‑studio owner who works digitally and 'in the box', I've always been a little bit sceptical about products that are supposed to make mixing on a computer more like mixing in the analogue domain. The Virtual Console Collection comprises two plug‑ins: Virtual Channel (left) and Virtual Mix Buss (right). Can the failings of mixing in software really be solved by buying more software? That's the claim Slate Digital are making for their Virtual Console Collection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |